Advertisement
Tiananmen Square crackdown
Opinion
David Zweig
David Zweig

Why Tiananmen Square’s real legacy may be Communist Party unity and the success of Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms

  • After June 4, the purge of liberals who wanted political reform may have given Deng Xiaoping the space he needed to keep economic reforms going when the communist bloc collapsed

4-MIN READ4-MIN
Illustration: Craig Stephens
David Zweig
David Zweig is chair professor of Social Science at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and managing director of Transnational China Consulting Limited.

Sometime around June 4, 1989, rumours circulated that Deng Xiaoping had said that 200 lives were a small price for China to pay for 20 years of stability. While China clearly did not gain 20 years of stability, the case can be made that, in retrospect, by allowing the purge of the entire liberal wing of the Communist Party, June 4 brought “great unity” to that leadership, which has facilitated China’s rise to great-power status.

The decade of the 1980s was intellectually vibrant. China was deeply engrossed in searching for a pathway forward from Maoism to markets, but there were no successful models to follow. Moreover, the leadership was polarised – less so in the early 1980s but, by 1986, sharp contradictions split the leadership.

On one side, adamant reformers, such as Hu Yaobang, Wan Li, Zhao Ziyang and Hu Qili, insisted that political reform must go hand in hand with market reforms if China’s transformation was to succeed. On the other side were leftist hardliners, such as Li Peng, Yao Yilin (Wang Qishan’s father-in-law), Chen Yun and the Beijing leadership, who favoured planning over markets and no political change at all.

While the former group emphasised “opening and reform”, the latter clung to Deng’s “four cardinal principles”, the most important being the dominance of the Communist Party and the “socialist road”.

Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice