appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Zhang Baohui

After the last round of trade negotiations in Beijing, China and the United States have signalled progress towards an agreement.
US President Donald Trump, after hearing reports from US trade negotiators, tweeted on Sunday that “Big progress [is] being made on soooo many different fronts! Our Country has such fantastic potential for future growth and greatness on an even higher level”.
Chinese President Xi Jinping, in his meeting with US delegation last Friday, also congratulated negotiators from both countries for their success in achieving broad progress towards a final agreement.
Comments by both leaders generate hope for a successful deal. This would serve not only the interests of the two countries but also the world community.


As the world’s largest economies, China and the US have obligations not to throw the global economy into uncertainty. While both have legitimate national interests to protect, they cannot shirk their global responsibilities. Because of their combined economic weight, a trade war will wreck global economic prosperity.
According to the World Bank study “Global Economic Prospects, Darkening Skies”, released on January 9, the risk of rising trade protectionism remains high. New US tariffs and the retaliatory response of trading partners now affect close to [US]$430 billion of global imports”.
As a result, the bank says the US-China trade war could make a global recession likely by 2020, and the uncertainty it generates “is likely to weigh on firms’ willingness to invest, export and engage in international value chains, with negative effects on the global trade outlook”.
In addition to global recession, China and the US would pay a price for the trade war. The bank predicts US growth would drop from 2.9 per cent in 2018 to 2.5 per cent in 2019, and China’s growth from 6.5 per cent to 6.2 per cent.
As Xi said in his meeting with the US delegation, “We all think that in terms of maintaining the prosperity and stability of the world, as well as promoting global economic prosperity and development, our two countries share broad mutual interests”.
The path to cooperation is no doubt fraught. Due to its relative decline and the re-emergence of a multipolar world, Washington has been anxious. As a result, the Trump administration has shifted towards a more competitive strategy. Hence, the administration has defined China as a “strategic competitor”.
Countries typically exaggerate others’ malign intentions. For example, many in the US exaggerate China’s intent to replace it as the world’s dominant power. Mutual exaggeration of malign intentions can lead states into cold wars, which harm the interests of both parties.
US paranoia aside, China would benefit from trade reforms
A successful deal between China and the US would promote strategic mutual trust and prevent a new cold war. It would convince China that US motives are confined to “unfair” trade relations only.
Such as a conviction would motivate China to make the necessary concessions for a trade agreement. Conversely, if it perceives the US as intent on a cold war, this would motivate China to stand firm.
A successful deal would therefore prove that while the two great powers will certainly compete, they can nonetheless work with each other to safeguard global stability and avoid a new cold war.
This new bilateral relationship could constitute a commendable model for great power relations in the 21st century. They would also prove that they could act responsibly, in the world’s common interests.
Given the stakes, if the two sides have indeed made genuine progress but cannot narrow final differences before the March 1 deadline, Washington should consider postponing the deadline. Recently, Trump indicated that he may consider this possibility if significant progress has made a final agreement likely.
Why China shouldn’t celebrate if Trump loses the border wall battle
Moreover, the US should pursue a longer-term, flexible negotiating strategy to enable a deal in the coming weeks or months.
It is reported that China has been willing to take significant measures to address trade deficits, forced transfer of technologies, protection of intellectual property rights and market access by US companies.
However, the US demands that China stop subsidising state-owned enterprises, as these violate free trade principles and distort trade relations.
This insistence, while legitimate in many regards, could derail a deal. Washington is asking for nothing less than an overhaul of the Chinese economic model.

Indeed, the so-called China model is built on the coexistence of state and private sectors. This would be hard for Beijing to swallow; as Xi warned last Friday, while China wants to cooperate with the US, China would only consider “an agreement acceptable to both sides”.
Even with a deal, China’s disputes with US are set to intensify
To prevent the issue from derailing an agreement, the US should consider a more patient strategy aiming for longer-term changes to the Chinese economic model.
It must recognise that it is impractical to change the economic system of another country – a peer great power – with a few rounds of trade negotiations. Instead, Washington should be aware that China has been debating the need for further market reforms.
The US strategy should be to encourage China, while applying appropriate pressures, towards that goal.
The right way is to seek maximum Chinese commitments to the reforms of its state-owned sectors while avoiding a last-minute failure of trade negotiations. Further reforms of China’s state sectors should be on the agenda of future rounds of trade negotiations.
As long as China makes enough progress towards significant reductions in trade deficits, better protection of US technologies and greater market access by American companies, Washington should be willing to seal a deal with Beijing. This flexible, longer-term strategy is both realistic and responsible.
Zhang Baohui is a professor of political science and director of the Centre for Asian Pacific Studies at Lingnan University in Hong Kong. He is the author of China’s Assertive Nuclear Posture: State Security in an Anarchic International Order


Trade truce extension aside, was AI the real Xi-Trump summit breakthrough?

Xi-Trump summit: Hong Kong’s Paul Chan predicts positive market response

Southeast Asia faces a false binary in US-China mineral trade

Xi-Trump atmospherics welcomed but mask structural rifts: analysts

US-China trade war

A US demand for China to give up its economic model would doom trade talks

Illustration: Craig Stephens

epa07371372 US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer (L) listens as Chinese Vice Premier Liu He (R) talks while they line up for a group photo at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing, China, 15 February 2019. EPA-EFE/MARK SCHIEFELBEIN / POOL

As the clock ticks, there’s a path to a ‘win-win’ outcome in US-China trade talks

Chinese President Xi Jinping meets US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer (second left), US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin (left) and Chinese officials in Beijing on Friday. Photo: AP

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping next to U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin before proceeding to their meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China February 15, 2019. Andy Wong/Pool via REUTERS

The US-China relationship is too big to fail, but are Trump and Xi the men to save it?

Illustration: Timothy Mcevenue. See: www.timothymcevenue.net

(FILES) In this file photo taken on January 31, 1979 from right: Chinese modernizer Deng Xiaoping, US First Lady Rosalynn Carter, US President Jimmy Carter and Deng's wife Cho Lin smile for the media at the White House in Washington DC, during the Chinese leader's visit to the US. - Former US president Jimmy Carter warned Monday, December 31, 2018 of the risks of sliding into a Cold War with China and called on the powers to find common cause on African development. Marking the 40th anniversary of his January 1979 normalization of relations with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, Carter voiced concern that both countries were increasingly describing each other as threats. (Photo by STF / CONSOLIDATED PICTURES / AFP)

Opinion

By insisting that China stop subsidies to state-owned enterprises, among other demands, the US is likely to derail trade negotiations the entire world needs to see succeed. Washington should adopt a longer-term and more flexible approach


By insisting that China stop subsidies to state-owned enterprises, among other demands, the US is likely to derail trade negotiations the entire world needs to see succeed. Washington should adopt a longer-term and more flexible approach.


US-China trade war: All stories

US-China trade war: Opinion

US-China relations

State-owned enterprises

Trade

China economy

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)
