Advertisement
Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, photographed here at a session of an investment forum in Moscow in October 2014, was detained in Canada on December 1 at the request of the US government. Photo: Reuters
Huawei chief financial officer Sabrina Meng Wanzhou wiped away tears on Tuesday as she was granted US$7.5 million bail by a Canadian judge. Yet the relief is only temporary: on February 6, the court will reconvene to decide whether she will be extradited to the US and face the possibility of decades in prison. 
Immediately after Meng’s detention on December 1, speculation turned to politics. Given the Trump administration’s adversarial approach to Beijing, it’s understandable that her arrest would be seen through the lens of an increasingly fraught US-China relationship.
Yet, often overlooked in the media frenzy is the alleged transgression believed to be behind Meng’s arrest: a violation of sanctions against Iran. She stands accused of hiding the relationship between Huawei and SkyCom, a company that did business in Iran. There is a widespread sense – fanned by sensationalist media reports – that, while the case is ostensibly about sanctions, the true issue is Huawei’s commercial clout and links to Chinese security services.
But what if, on this occasion at least, a cigar is just a cigar? Rather than a casualty of America’s trade war with China, could Huawei in fact be a bellwether of Washington’s new willingness to enforce sanctions regardless of the nationality and clout of potential violators? If so, the world would be wise to listen.
There are signs that the US Department of Justice has been looking into potential Chinese violations of Iran sanctions for months, if not years. In April, it got its first big scalp: ZTE, Huawei’s main rival in China. The US imposed an export ban on ZTE, blocking US companies from exporting goods to the company for seven years.
Advertisement