Advertisement

Macroscope | Why China’s online lending crisis makes liberalisation of bank interest rates more urgent

  • Joe Zhang says as many of China’s online lenders fold, a key question is whether they should continue to exist alongside banks subject to interest rate controls
  • There is also a compelling case for regional Chinese banks to rejuvenate themselves by acquiring online lenders

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
CEO Min Luo (left) and chief financial officer Carl Yeung of online payday loan platform Qudian celebrate as their company’s shares start trading on the New York Stock Exchange on October 18, 2017. The company has since seen its share price tumble amid social media criticism of its high interest rates and regulatory tightening in China. Photo: AP
How big is China’s fintech sector? I would say, Britain’s peer-to-peer (P2P) lender Funding Circle plus payday lender Wonga times 100. In addition to giants such as Alibaba’s Ant Financial, Pingan’s Lufax and Tencent’s WeBank, a dozen mid-size operators have gone public in the US and Hong Kong in the past 18 months alone. There are also 40 to 50 serious players that are waiting in the wings to go public. However, as the year-long official clampdown has revealed, there are far too many also-ran operators and Ponzi schemes about.

There is huge diversity in this fintech field: while most players are online lenders, some are data analysts, risk control specialists, delinquency workout firms and collection agents using artificial intelligence. Even among the online lenders, some use peer-to-peer funding and others rely on corporate and institutional funding.

In just five to six years, fintech has surged to levels over US$200 billion in terms of total assets. This has been thanks to the proliferation of smartphones, the country’s convenient payments infrastructure, and, more importantly, the quiet encouragement of the regulators until late last year. Well over a 100 million people have been drawn in as either funders or borrowers, or both.

A large number of regulated financial institutions and state-owned enterprises have been involved in this huge movement. Of the 2,000-odd P2P lending platforms, about 100 are controlled by state-owned enterprises. In fact, many such entities came into being with government officials as the cheerleaders.

A man wearing a uniform featuring an Alipay logo stands on a street in Tokyo during a promotional campaign for the mobile payment platform in December 2017. Ant Financial is one of the giants of China’s fintech sector, but it exists alongside thousands of smaller players. Photo: Bloomberg
A man wearing a uniform featuring an Alipay logo stands on a street in Tokyo during a promotional campaign for the mobile payment platform in December 2017. Ant Financial is one of the giants of China’s fintech sector, but it exists alongside thousands of smaller players. Photo: Bloomberg
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x