Donald Trump’s economic sanctions on Iran are doomed to fail, as a century of experience reveals
- A century of experience with sanctions, most often imposed by large nations against the small, details the pain they inflict and shows up their ineffectiveness
- Among the flawed arguments used to justify them, seven fallacies must be debunked

Given the pain that Trump’s unilateral sanctions are causing Iran, are they really the “silver bullet” policy that his administration hopes they will be?
Since the first world war, governments have increasingly used economic sanctions to achieve their international political objectives. Despite a century of experience, however, the rationale for such measures remains far from compelling.
Economic sanctions have become even more popular in recent decades. In the 1990s, for example, sanctions regimes were introduced at an average rate of about seven per year. Of the 67 cases in that decade, two-thirds were unilateral sanctions imposed by the United States. In fact, the great majority of sanctions are imposed by large countries against small countries.
