How Hong Kong can shed its reputation as a tax haven
Kalina Tsang says the government’s half-hearted attempt to enforce better information sharing with other jurisdictions to combat cross-border tax evasion does not go far enough, and it should be bolder

Panama Papers just the start in ‘tax war’ but more action needed
The good news is that the Hong Kong government has shown some intention to salvage its reputation by submitting the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2017 to the Legislative Council in April. The bill seeks to conclude bilateral pacts for the automatic exchange of financial account information in tax matters with 74 other tax jurisdictions. Such cooperation is vital for combating cross-border tax avoidance.
As welcome a move as this is, it is unclear whether the government is really pulling its weight
As welcome a move as this is, it is unclear whether the government is really pulling its weight. There are some glaring omissions in the list of 74 jurisdictions, when compared with the list in the OECD’s multilateral instrument to fight tax evasion, the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. The Hong Kong plan ignores five major tax havens – Panama, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Barbados and Monaco – which are all signatories of the OECD convention.
And, should Hong Kong join the treaty, it would enter into a pact with its 109 jurisdictions all at once, rather than sign them one by one. Yet, this more efficient route has been not taken. Why?