Advertisement
Hong Kong's tainted water scare
Opinion

Hong Kong officials lack crisis management skills

The debacle following the lead-in-water scandal in 2015 is a worrying sign of the culture in the civil service

2-MIN READ2-MIN
Resident Fung Hung-fong, 75, of Kai Ching Estate refill water from the newly installed temporary pipes. Photo: May Tse
SCMP Editorial
The scandal in which water supply for tens of thousands of public rental flats was tainted with lead has exposed serious flaws in the monitoring of public housing projects. Subsequent investigations by auditors and lawmakers found that the follow-up actions taken by the government after the 2015 crisis were also unsatisfactory. The performance falls short of what is expected of a responsible government.

It is baffling that officials could not produce any records on the first seven cross-departmental discussions on how to handle the fallout. The Legislative Council committee looking into the matter heard that officials were “too focused” at the time and did not realise that no minutes were taken. The explanation is hardly convincing. While lawmakers said they could not find any evidence of the departments concerned trying to cover up the scandal, it begs the question of what prompted officials to record their subsequent meetings. The failure to record official meetings is not just a deviation from standing procedure; it also prevented lawmakers and the public from monitoring government performance.

Democratic Party's Legislator Helena Wong Pik-wan, checks the water pipe and hose at Tak Long Estate in June 02, 2016. Photo: Nora Tam
Democratic Party's Legislator Helena Wong Pik-wan, checks the water pipe and hose at Tak Long Estate in June 02, 2016. Photo: Nora Tam
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice