Advertisement

China must play fair in acquiring foreign assets and technology

Michael Clauss says a Chinese company’s offer to buy a top robotics maker in Germany has amplified criticism of unfair competition, as state-backed Chinese firms are shielded from competitors and have access to huge funds

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A robot prepares a cup of coffee at the booth of robotics manufacturer Kuka, on the eve of the opening of the Hanover Fair earlier this year. Photo: AFP
The unsolicited takeover bid for Kuka, a German company with a multibillion-dollar turnover that successfully delivers industrial robots and other hi-tech automation solutions around the world, has stirred a controversial debate in Germany and Europe. A similar debate is also taking place in many other industrialised countries, not least the United States, which conducted its eighth US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue this week. Just days after that meeting, German Chancellor Angela Merkel will lead her cabinet colleagues for the fourth round of the Germany-China intergovernmental consultations.

US presses China to lower barriers for foreign business as confidence hit by protectionist concerns

Why is there even a debate, and why is it happening now? Germany is a global leader in openness towards foreign investment. Foreign takeovers are not subject to special scrutiny, let alone restrictions. The only restrictions we have are extremely narrowly defined and relate to security risks, usually with military relevance. There is a strong traditional consensus that this openness has been a major factor in keeping Germany’s manufacturing sector globally competitive – by subjecting it to relentless competition.

Advertisement
President Xi Jinping and German Chancellor Angela Merkel hold a press conference in Berlin, during Xi’s 2014 visit. China’s investments are warmly welcomed in Germany, even by trade unions: Chinese investors have a good record in keeping and creating jobs. Photo: AFP
President Xi Jinping and German Chancellor Angela Merkel hold a press conference in Berlin, during Xi’s 2014 visit. China’s investments are warmly welcomed in Germany, even by trade unions: Chinese investors have a good record in keeping and creating jobs. Photo: AFP

It’s in China’s own interest to level the playing field for foreign companies

Chinese investments, in particular, are warmly welcomed, even by trade unions: Chinese investors have a good record in maintaining and even increasing employment.

With the Kuka takeover bid, we now see different views emerge. Some are even mulling a possible European counter-offer. What are their concerns? They can be summarised by the acronym “Aittac” – that is, asymmetric investment, technology transfer and competition.

Asymmetric investment: Germany and others maintain an open investment environment, while China has not made any tangible progress towards further opening. Joint venture obligations have not been lifted, financial services are tightly closed to foreign investors, which hold a market share of about 2 per cent, and so-called “negative lists” for foreign investment, though often talked about, are not materialising. Protectionism is on the rise and the burgeoning bureaucracy of licensing appears to be a tool of choice: A US$30 million factory by a pharmaceutical company is now under severe threat because of discriminatory licensing practices.

Advertisement
Electric cars line a parking lot at an automobile factory in Xingtai, Hebei province. Handing over core technology seems to be the entry ticket into China’s promising electric vehicle market. Photo: Reuters
Electric cars line a parking lot at an automobile factory in Xingtai, Hebei province. Handing over core technology seems to be the entry ticket into China’s promising electric vehicle market. Photo: Reuters
loading
Advertisement