Repression or reform? How China is being torn by opposing forces
Terry Lautz warns against reaching easy conclusions about an authoritarian China moving down a path of control; international opinion isn’t as negative as many believe


Today’s China is something like this impossible animal with two heads facing in opposite directions. One looks towards openness and reform – freedom of expression, unfettered access to the internet and an independent legal system. It thinks that China’s continued development depends on wider acceptance of liberal values and norms. The other head believes, to the contrary, that China’s paramount need is unity and stability, guided by the Communist Party. The leadership must do whatever it takes to avoid the fate of the former Soviet Union or, for that matter, the chaos of the Cultural Revolution. To maintain its internal sovereignty and external security, Beijing must be assertive in guarding its interests.
For Beijing, the tycoon class can never rise above the party
China is pushed and pulled in both directions, but now appears to be moving on a perplexing path of more control than reform. If the continued success of its economy depends on greater creativity and innovation, isn’t it counterproductive to restrict its citizens’ access to ideas and information? If China needs to maintain smooth relations with the rest of the world for the sake of its growth and development, why run the risk of antagonising other nations with aggressive behaviour?
There are multiple theories for China’s more authoritarian domestic policy and assertive foreign policy: