Equality laws need urgent reform if Hong Kong is to keep its status as an international business centre
York Chow says the Equal Opportunities Commission’s wide-ranging review of Hong Kong anti-discrimination legislation must be acted upon


The commission’s own experience in implementing the law has demonstrated gaps in protection
Over the last two decades, Hong Kong society has evolved in significant ways, which have tangible implications for its equality landscape. The commission’s own experience in implementing the law has demonstrated gaps in protection which render us unable to handle some claims of unjust discrimination. We also see how international trends have moved from providing individual redress for discrimination towards proactive steps to both prevent and tackle inequalities entrenched in policies and practices.
Without taking appropriate action, Hong Kong risks falling behind global human rights standards and losing our status as an international business centre that is open to all. As importantly, without reforms, the changing needs and demands of our society for greater inclusion and equality cannot be adequately addressed.
Hong Kong rights activists hope to see holes plugged in Race Discrimination Ordinance
Bearing this in mind, the commission began in 2013 the most comprehensive review of Hong Kong’s anti-discrimination legislation in the city’s history. Seeking evidence for reforms and a platform for different stakeholders to voice their views, the commission launched a four-month public consultation in July 2014. We saw an overwhelming response from the public – a total of 125,041 submissions were received – which was the largest ever in any of the commission’s consultation exercises.
Experts give their views on proposed reforms of Hong Kong anti-discrimination laws
Grateful for the public interest, the commission took the various views into serious consideration while formulating our position on issues. In particular, the commission looked at the evidence and reasoning provided, if any, when analysing the responses. In addition, we considered a number of other factors, including our operational experience in handling complaints and conducting research, evidence and seriousness of the discrimination, the number of people affected, and Hong Kong’s human rights obligations under the Bill of Rights and international laws.