Why China will meet its growth targets
Justin Yifu Lin argues that the GDP and other targets set by China’s 13th five-year plan are not over-ambitious, as some analysts said, but are well within reach
China’s recently finalised 13th five-year plan maps out its economic strategy and ambition for the 2016-2020 period. Among its objectives are a doubling of GDP and average rural and urban household incomes relative to their 2010 levels.
These targets would require China’s economy to grow at an average annual rate of at least 6.5 per cent during the next five years. Given that China’s growth has decelerated every quarter since the beginning of 2010, some have questioned whether it is achievable. I believe that it is.
Growth target will be met: China’s Premier Li Keqiang as he vows cuts in taxes and red tape
Economic growth results from increases in labour productivity caused by technological advance and industrial upgrading. The question for China, after 36 years of catching up with advanced countries, is how much longer it can continue to benefit from this process. Some scholars believe it has reached its limits. They point to how other East Asian countries experienced a deceleration of growth after their per capita gross domestic product reached about US$11,000 in purchasing-power-parity terms.
I disagree. This analysis fails to take into account the fact that advanced countries are growing and making technological breakthroughs. And that creates opportunities for developing countries to continue to learn.
Key takeaways from China’s 13th five-year plan and annual reports
The best indicator of China’s growth potential is not its per capita GDP relative to some arbitrary threshold; it is the difference in per capita GDP between China and the US, the world’s most advanced economy. And on this measure, China has plenty of room for expansion. When Japan crossed the US$11,000 threshold in 1972, its per capita GDP was 72 per cent of the US level. When Taiwan crossed it in 1992, its per capita GDP was 48 per cent of America’s. The comparable figure for China today is only about 30 per cent.
