Hope for the best, but expect little from Fifa’s next president
Kevin Rafferty says whoever is elected the next chief of football’s world governing body is unlikely to initiate the wide-ranging and radical reforms needed for the beautiful game to grow healthily
It is the world’s biggest religion, with more than 3.5 billion fanatical supporters and 270 million active priests and officials. Yet, on Friday, a mere 209 people will choose the new supreme high pontiff of the religion that is also a US$2 billion-a-year business, with reserves of US$1.5 billion, after months of secret wheeling and dealing that show the leaders have learned little from their recent corrupt history.
Five candidates will contest to be head of the world governing body of football, Fifa. But none has a résumé that would stand up in top business circles.
There is one vote for Brazil, the country that put “beautiful” into the “beautiful game”; one vote for England, whose Premier League clubs are worth about US$12 billion; one vote each for China and India, with 38 per cent of the world’s population; and one vote for Montserrat, which isn’t even a country and has a population of just 4,900.
READ MORE: Fifa candidate Sheikh Salman denies British MP’s allegations of inappropriate funds use
Of the five candidates, not one talks of having kicked a football professionally; they are apparatchiks of money or power. All talk of reform and the need to clean up the game. Shaikh Salman bin Ebrahim al-Khalifa from Bahrain – hardly a household name in football – is odds-on favourite. He has strong support in Africa and Asia, whose confederation members tend to follow the party line, even though Fifa’s president is chosen by secret ballot.