appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Jake Van Der Kamp

The financial secretary has emphasised previously that he would rather invest more in the city’s future and spend in areas such as innovation than give out money to everyone. -- SCMP, February 24
What a waste of breath it is to talk about investing in the future. It is like saying that you undertake a journey in order to reach your destination.
All investment is investment in the future. You forego spending of your money today in order that you may have more money or create better conditions for spending it tomorrow. No one invests in the past.
Well ... ahem ...
That is to say that very few people do so but, of those who do, a good number are to be found in the ranks of our bureaucracy. They do it every time they talk about putting money into innovation. They mean well but innovation is something they do not understand.
For starters, they are bureaucrats, people who take directives rather than conceiving them. At their top ranks, they take directives from government headquarters in that globe-topped building in western district. They don’t do new things.
It is very difficult anyway to know what is truly innovative and what is not. Venture capitalists look for it all the time and fail many more times than they succeed. Innovation does not advertise itself. It rather looks on most occasions as silliness, and sure to go nowhere.
Take, for instance, that fellow who conceived the idea of a four-rotor battery-powered drone while a student at our University of Science and Technology. It proved to be a world winner, but he had to go to Shenzen to put it into production. Our innovation administrators would not give it a look-see.
This was no aberration. It is the rule when bureaucrats try to push innovation. They just take yesterday’s ideas and spend a lot of money trying to keep them alive today.
This may indeed succeed. The supposed innovations stay alive much longer than they would ordinarily do, before they inevitably wither away. Just ask Singapore about its experience with Chartered Semiconductor. Ask Britain and France about the Concord jet.
Never was a better government decision made in Hong Kong about innovation than when our former Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen, while financial secretary, told technology lobbyists to get lost when they plagued him for land grants to build a wafer fabrication plant
They went to Shanghai instead as Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), got themselves involved in intellectual property theft disputes and, latest seen, reported yet another decline in earnings. Well done, Donald.
The worst of it is that these government blunderings in innovation tend to suppress real creativity in the fields in which they are made. They crowd the truly good ideas out and starve them of money.
But I do know of one very good way of encouraging innovation. It is to do what our financial secretary reportedly does not wish to do. It is to “give out money to everyone.”
Let me amend this. It is rather not to take it from them in the first place. We are at present running a fiscal surplus of HK$160 billion a year, we have had only one slight brush with deficit over the last 14 years, we have almost HK$2 trillion (US$255.6 billion) in fiscal savings, and it’s becoming a little ridiculous to talk of needing to save money for the proverbial “rainy day”.
Cutting taxes instead of investing these savings to support the deficit spending of the United States government, which is what we actually do with the money, would stimulate economic activity.
But it would do more than that. It would give seven million people greater leisure to devote their intellectual powers to innovation in millions of ways that we cannot really imagine at the moment. It is a far better way of encouraging innovation than taking people’s money from them, and squandering it on the false innovation that government invariably favours.
But then, of course, the government would no longer be in control of how the money is spent, which would not contribute to the greater glory of government. Can’t have that.
And thus what we will have today is some one-off concessions that open the purse, but which keep the purse strings firmly in the financial secretary’s hands.


Good news for Hong Kong in leaked Carrie Lam tape: a solution to the unrest is at hand

Why is Hong Kong’s efficient government so slow on cash handouts?

Free exchange of data and bio samples will boost Hong Kong’s innovation sector, Science Park CEO says

Hong Kong to spend HK$45 billion grooming the next leaders of technology and boosting innovation

Hong Kong Budget 2018-2019

Try this for an idea: Hong Kong’s fiscal surplus gives us the ability to cut taxes and spur innovation

With HK$2 trillion in surplus, it’s ridiculous to talk of saving money for the proverbial “rainy day.” Cutting taxes would spur people to devote their intellectual powers to innovation in ways that we cannot imagine.

(bottom to top)DJI's Mavic Pro, Mavic Air, and Spark. SCMP/ Josh Ye

Ping Guo, Assistant Professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong’s Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, demonstrating a prototype of a self-levitating device at CUHK on 9 October 2017. Photo: SCMP / Dickson Lee

HK’s large fiscal reserves could help boost public health services

The registration counter at Tuen Mun Hospital. The New Territories clusters are expected to face increased bed shortages by 2021. Photo: Nora Tam

Hong Kong civil servants set for higher than expected pay rise this fiscal year

Pedestrians walk past the Murray Building in Central. If the government had adopted the figures from its annual pay trend survey, civil servants would have received rises of 3.46 per cent, 4.12 per cent and 3.02 per cent for upper, middle, and lower earners. A total of 105 private companies were surveyed for the study.
 Photo: Nora Tam

Hong Kong leader backs proposal to dump ‘miserly’ fiscal philosophy

Carrie Lam wrote in her manifesto about the need to invest more generously for the future. Photo: Sam Tsang

Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah meets the media after delived his ninth budget at Legco in Tammar. 24FEB16 SCMP / Sam Tsang

Interview with Former Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) chief executive Joseph Yam Chi-kwong in Wan Chai. 25MAY17 SCMP / David Wong

Hong Kong must pick the right fiscal course to protect growth

Hong Kong people prepare to celebrate the Lunar New Year. With US interest rates heading upwards, and mainland China rebalancing, the IMF expects only a gradual pick-up in Hong Kong’s growth rate, to 1.9 per cent in 2017. Photo: EPA

TOPSHOT - This picture taken on January 6, 2017, shows a man covered in a rain coat driving his scooter down an empty road in Jiaxing, China's Jiangsu province. / AFP PHOTO / Johannes EISELE

Hong Kong must reconsider a broader tax base for fiscal stability

Business

Money

Spending

News

Hong Kong

Hong Kong Economy

Tech

Innovation

Enterprises

Opinion

With HK$2 trillion in surplus, it’s ridiculous to talk of saving money for the proverbial 'rainy day'. Cutting taxes would spur people to devote their intellectual powers to innovation in ways that we cannot imagine.


Hong Kong innovators

Corporate tax

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Jake’s View