Name: SCMP
Telephone: +852-2680-8888

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Jake Van Der Kamp

The transport chief yesterday gave an optimistic financial outlook for the controversial HK$84.4 billion high-speed rail link to the mainland, saying it would turn a profit in 50 years, though he gave no figures to back this up.
-- SCMP City, January 30
I know that a good number of people will wrinkle their noses at this talk of the profit potential of the new high speed rail link.
It is the wrong way of looking at things, they will say. This is not a capitalist venture. We did not build this railway to make a profit. We built it as a social service to provide people with rapid rail connections to Guangzhou and the mainland’s high speed rail system.
But if you must look at it in money terms, they will say, then time is money in business and shorter travel times will thus help business, which will be good for the economy of Hong Kong. It is therefore a worthwhile project.
I don’t buy it.
The difficulty with this line of reasoning is that when you spend money on anything you have to ask yourself whether the purchase you are considering will bring you greater benefit than something else you can buy. It is as much a question at the level of government as it is for personal expenditure.
Thus, taking my favourite example of wasteful social spending, what would you say to a proposal that we build a rail tunnel from the tip of Lamma Island to Antarctica?
It will create lots of jobs, long lasting ones, too, and if we ever get to Antarctica we will have a big tourist draw. On both counts the economy of Hong Kong will benefit. It is therefore a worthwhile project.
Don’t be silly, you say. Of course it is not worthwhile. But this rail new link is different. It will bring us real benefits.
To this I say that the difference is only a matter of degree. Will these benefits truly be worth the HK$84.4 billion (US$10.8 billion) of construction spending, leave alone the cost of the rolling stock and the continued expense of operating and maintaining it all?


Bear in mind here that we already have a railway across the border, not to mention extensive road connections, air traffic links and even ferry services. We are talking not of a completely new service but only of cutting travel times on one of several different forms of transport services.
And there is one easy way of getting an answer to the crucial question. We can ask the users. We can do this by setting passenger fares at a level that will cover the debt service on HK$84.4 billion of construction cost plus the depreciation and operating charges and perhaps a small return to the public purse.
It is my guess, and I am confident of it, that this rail service would attract very few passengers indeed if we were to do so. The fares would be much too high.
In fact, it is a certainty when the public official responsible for the project talks of turning a profit in 50 years, and won’t even back up this wild conjecture with numbers, but instead already talks of fare concessions to attract passengers.
So let me pose the obvious question. If even the prospective passengers are likely to think the alternatives are better value for money, if even the businessman who thinks time is money finds that the time he saves is not worth the money, why should anyone think it worthwhile?
The simple hard truth is that the social value way of evaluating a project like this is no different at all from the capitalist way. 
And if you do not immediately appreciate this, then ask yourself why the public purse, instead of the users, should be asked to bear the continued burden of this ridiculously expensive railway when we also have an overburdened public health system that could dearly use the money, and a crying need to provide now for an ageing population.
The reason this railway was always wrong is that there was always much more and much better that we could do with the money.
And profit is the measure of it. Don’t wrinkle your nose.


Faster, bolder action needed to empower women across the Asia-Pacific

OpenAI wants US to team up with allies to beat China in AI race

Hong Kong enterprise AI adoption sees upswing on back of government policy support

Bhutan aims to sell Southeast Asia on its 21-year ‘mindfulness city’ project

Infrastructure

Let’s not kid ourselves: money on Hong Kong’s high-speed rail can be better spent elsewhere

This August 2, 2017 photo shows bullet trains at the parking place in Hong Kong, south China. The Hong Kong section of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link is expected to be completed in 2018. From Guangdong to Hong Kong and Macau, can people work in one city and sleep in another? With the help of infrastructure. Photo: Xinhua

Don’t waste HK$80 million it will take to run Hong Kong high-speed rail by blocking bill, MTR urges

Three ministers also seek to ease pan-democrats’ concerns that Basic Law would be undermined with presence of mainland officials in city terminus

Hong Kong Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung (left) and Secretary for Security John Lee Ka-chiu addressing the high-speed rail project on Saturday. Photo: David Wong

Does China have the inside track in race with Japan for Singapore-Malaysia high-speed rail contract?

Attendants pose for a photo beside the models of a high-speed train during the China High Speed Railway on Fast Track exhibition in Jakarta, Indonesia. China is competing for a contract to build a high-speed railway connecting Singapore and Malaysia. Photo: Reuters

A visitor looks at a model of the proposed Bandar Malaysia development, which Iskandar Waterfront Holdings Sdn. and China Railway Engineering Corp. bought 60 percent of in December last year for 7.41 billion ringgit, stands in a showroom in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on Friday, Oct. 7, 2016. The development will host terminals for a planned high-speed rail line connecting Kuala Lumpur to Singapore and has an estimated sales value of 150 billion ringgit. Photographer: Charles Pertwee/Bloomberg

Workers clean a high-speed train in Chongqing, southwest China. Photo: AFP

Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (L) shakes hands with Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak (R) during a joint press conference at the Prime Minister's Office in Putrajaya on December 13, 2016 following an official agreement signing ceremony for the construction of a high speed rail link between the city-state and Kuala Lumpur. / AFP PHOTO / MANAN VATSYAYANA

TO GO WITH AFP STORY Malaysia-politics-reform-vote-Mahathir,INTERVIEW by Dan Martin In a picture taken on June 14, 2012, former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad speaks during an interview with the Agence France-Fresse (AFP) at his office in Kuala Lumpur. Influential former strongman Mahathir Mohamad has thrown his weight behind a Malaysian conservative pushback against growing calls for change, saying reform could lift the lid on ethnic tensions. AFP PHOTO / Saeed KHAN

epa06052432 A handout photo made available by the World Economic Forum (WEF) shows Chinese Premier Li Keqiang speaking during the opening plenary of the World Economic Forum - Annual Meeting of the New Champions in Dalian, China, 27 June 2017. EPA/BENEDIKT VON LOEBELL/WEF HANDOUT HANDOUT HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES

Carrie Lam pushes for Legco to prioritise debate on high-speed rail link border checkpoint

Chief Executive says ‘time will be very tight’ if debate is delayed, as government aims to get Beijing’s endorsement for the plan by end of this year

Hong Kong Immigration Department. SCMP PICTURES (POOL)

Carrie Lam (middle) visits the West Kowloon terminal of the Hong Kong high-speed rail link with the mainland. Photo: Handout

Firms punished for cutting corners on Chinese high-speed rail line

A file picture of a high-speed train travelling in Anshun in Guizhou province. Photo: Agence France-Presse

=== PHOTO CAPTURED FROM WEIBO === pictures circulating on weibo about construction scandal of the high speed railway tunnels in Guizhou. Photo: WEIBO.

All aboard China’s newest high-speed rail service – from terracotta warrior world to giant panda country

The Xian-Chengdu high-speed railway line will start operation on Wednesday. Photo: Xinhua

The Xi’an-Chengdu high-speed railway line will start operation on 6th December, 2017. PHOTO: Xinhua

News

Hong Kong

Opinion

Comment

Business

Money

China Business

Hong Kong economy

Society

Transport and logistics

Hong Kong high-speed rail

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Jake's View

Jake'S View | Let’s not kid ourselves: money on Hong Kong’s high-speed rail can be better spent elsewhere