Advertisement

Time to taper? Not if you look at bank loans

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Roughly two-thirds of the money the Fed pumped into the banking system to ease a credit crunch has never been lent out, but stayed with the banks. Photo: AFP

The US Federal Reserve decided to hold off on scaling back its bond-buying program on Wednesday, and at least one reason for its choice may have been a stubbornly weak economic indicator: bank lending.

Advertisement

Since the bottom of the recession just over four years ago, commercial bank loans and leases have grown 4.0 per cent, one of the weakest post-recession recoveries in terms of borrowing since the 1960s, according to Paul Kasriel, the former chief economist of Northern Trust Company. For comparison, over the same period after the July 1990-March 1991 recession, loans and leases grew over four times faster.

“Given what’s happening to bank credit and given that the economy isn’t booming, I would say it was very wise that the Fed did not choose to cut back on its asset purchases at this point,” Kasriel said in an interview.

In recent weeks, residential mortgage lending has dropped and commercial lending growth has slowed as Fed officials have talked about starting to wind down their bond buying stimulus program. That talk of “tapering” spooked bond markets, lifting long-term borrowing costs.

The Fed noted in its statement that mortgage rates have risen, and added that “the tightening of financial conditions observed in recent months, if sustained, could slow the pace of improvement in the economy and labour market.”

Advertisement

The central bank’s statement underscores the narrow line the Fed must walk now between preventing asset bubbles and nurturing an economic recovery. As the Fed slows down its pace of bond buying in a program known as “Quantitative Easing III,” it will cool markets that may be overheated.

Advertisement