appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Jake Van Der Kamp

Another source familiar with [Science Park’s] vetting process said: “There is a feeling that the management is not doing things in the interest of science, but running it as a business, a piece of real estate. -- SCMP, December 4
Good. That is how it should be run. Only by treating the Science Park as a business, has it any hope of stimulating the New Technology ideas our government wants from it.
I recognise that this is contrary to the thinking of most people on the matter. The common notion is that to get technology start-ups, you have to put “seed money” into them to “pump prime” them into a state of “critical mass” for “take-off.” Pardon the mixed metaphors.
The accepted formula says this requires government help in the form of direct subsidy, cheap rents and technical assistance.
We shall let the record of the accepted formula speak for itself. The Science Park has been in existence for 16 years, and at present has about 650 corporate tenants in 21 buildings across a 33 hectare campus. This is a sizeable effort at promoting technology.
Now give me the name of a single big technology success spawned at Science Park. Believe me, if they had one, you would have never gotten their public relations trumpet out of your ears. Think! There has to be at least one, doesn’t there?
Read: Meet SenseTime, Hong Kong’s first hi-tech unicorn that no one’s heard of
Typically, what you find is the sales outlets of foreign digital service providers and gadget producers pretending to be teenie-weenie Hong Kong start-ups. You also get the usual flock of low-tech application writers and biotech companies talking bio-babble that no one really understands.
I have no serious objection to them trying it. I’m a connoisseur of corporate bluster. But it does annoy me sometimes to see academics, whose research we have funded at their universities, take their ideas private at Science Park the moment they foresee any commercial value.
Hey, professor, we paid for that. Pay us back. Asking us to subsidise you some more so that you can keep it all yourself is adding insult to injury.
And now to why I think we should run the Science Park as a business. The big underlying fallacy in the conventional thinking is that there are lots of good commercial technology ideas out there but little money to bring them to fruition.
The truth is exactly the reverse. There is always plenty of money looking for good ideas. The shortage lies in the ideas. Most of them are hopeless non-starters. You won’t get the deluded hopers to admit it, of course, but that is still how it is.
Read: HSBC, Science Park launch start-up accelerator with a twist as hunt for Hong Kong’s next ‘unicorn’ heats up
And this is why we have venture capitalists to sort them out. The accepted ratio - even for venture capital - is that only one out of 10 ideas works out, and The One must therefore pay back more than tenfold if the venture capitalist is to remain in business.
People with great ideas do not like this, of course. They all think they have a guaranteed win and they feel cheated when others take the profits of their successes, forgetting that these others also took the losses on the more common failures.
But if they feel hard done by, they can always try to delude their local bureaucrats with dreams about the wonders of the new economy and then get their money through technology subsidies.
What venture capitalists only find difficult, however, is impossible to bureaucrats who deal in rules and procedures, not the vagaries of fortune at the leading edge of new industries. Invariably the bureaucrats favour yesterday’s ideas and get it wrong.
Read: Innovative voice activated ring from Hong Kong start-up turns your finger into a phone
Worse yet, the few people with good ideas are often repelled or crowded out by the whole process of bureaucratic approval. There are cases of it on the record, for example the drone market DJI, which went to Shenzen instead of staying in Hong Kong.
Technology is best fostered as in any other business by rule of law, good infrastructure, sound public administration and low taxes. Giving it subsidies and rent concessions only keeps failures going, when their demise would otherwise leave room for possible successes.
To make Science Park a success, make it a business, a piece of real estate charging market rents. That is how to sort the wheat from the chaff.


The tale of murkiness that is the Lok Ma Chau Loop

China refusal to apologise for CCTV blackface skit all wrong

Plug Hong Kong Disney’s bottomless cash sinkhole forever and ever, and use its magic land for homes

China’s got a trade problem that can’t be solved by Belt and Road

Jake's View

Hong Kong’s Science Park may finally be at the point when it can put tax dollars behind good ideas

Hong Kong Science Park.In addition to offices and conference and exhibition venues, a number of food and beverage outlets within the park and a beautifully landscaped man made lake. Photo: Shutterstock

Cyberport, Science Park may be redundant

Competition with Science Park denied

Housing - not science - is the best use of land at Science Park's fourth phase

Artist impression of the future Phase 3 in Hong Kong Science Park. 

Plan to build flats on site earmarked for Science Park growth put on hold

A decision on a controversial plan to build flats on a site earmarked for the Hong Kong Science Park's expansion was put on hold yesterday by the Town Planning Board.

Open up city to foreign talent or risk lagging behind in innovation: Hong Kong Science Park chief

Fanny Law says Hong Kong still needs time to adopt a more open mindset towards hiring foreign professionals. Photo: Sam Tsang

Business

Tech

Enterprises

Innovation

Science & Research

News

Hong Kong

Hong Kong Economy

Opinion

The truth with start-ups is there’s usually more money than good ideas, but that is a shortage that very few budding entrepreneur would dare to admit.


Start-ups

Technology

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Jake’s View

Hong Kong’s Science Park may finally be at the point when it can put tax dollars behind good ideas

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}The truth with start-ups is there’s usually more money than good ideas, but that is a shortage that very few budding entrepreneur would dare to admit.

The truth with start-ups is there’s usually more money than good ideas, but that is a shortage that very few budding entrepreneur would dare to admit.