Finding a fix

Less than nine months before the election of the next Hong Kong chief executive, this is a strangely quiet time. Sure, there is much talk about which 'horses' will be in the running. Yet something is missing. Are we not in the middle of the worst confidence crisis in the establishment - from government to legislature - since the handover? Isn't the next chief executive meant to lead us out of this mess? Where are the promises? Indeed, where and from whom can we seek such promises?

In any other democracy, common people will have been consulted many times over in their constituencies on what they want for the future, when a contest for the top post is so near. Thanks to the distorted system here, all but 1,200 members of the public are disenfranchised in the chief executive election. As a result, potential candidates are more interested in out-doing each other in publicity stunts than offering solutions. If past experience is of any guide, the next chief executive will be able to get away with the slimmest of election platforms. Nobody can hold him or her to any promise.

That is a disaster for Hong Kong since a rare opportunity for soul-searching and consensus-building will have been lost.

Against this background, the Professional Commons, an independent think tank with many Election Committee voters among its members, has come up with a mock chief executive platform. Comprising nearly 100 policy initiatives, the platform is organised under three main sections in correspondence with what Hong Kong needs most at this time: to reconfigure our core values, to expand our economic horizon, and to attain a decent living standard for all.